nasaforums.com

Official Forums of the National Auto Sport Association
It is currently Tue Jun 18, 2013 2:27 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Fuel Safe or ATL?
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 5:24 am 
Offline
Forum Time Trialer
Forum Time Trialer
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 8:06 pm
Posts: 214
Location: Bradenton/Sarasota, Florida
I'm going to put a cell in my 1988 Mustang AI car. Is there any real difference between Fuel Safe or ATL? Pricing looks to be about equal. I'm thinking about something in the 32 gallon range. Does one have better service than the other? I have a Fuel Safe in my FFR, I've never been wildly happy with the Fuel Safe customer service, but I don't know if ATL is any better. Thoughts? And where to buy? Thanks.

_________________
2010 NASA National Champion
2009 NASA National Champion
2008 NASA National Champion


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fuel Safe or ATL?
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 9:36 am 
Offline
Forum Time Trialer
Forum Time Trialer

Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 2:26 pm
Posts: 255
Location: VA
Only thought I have is that's a big tank for an AI car, especially a fox. Perhaps you're going to run enduros? My AI car has a 15gal ATL cell, no problems, but never needed any tech support either. You leaving the FFR's and coming to AI? Cool if that's the plan...

_________________
Ed Hunter
AI #215 Mid-Atlantic
88 foxbody - RIP 4/12
05 in the garage being built...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fuel Safe or ATL?
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 9:55 am 
Offline
Hard-core Forum Racer
Hard-core Forum Racer

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2003 6:34 am
Posts: 620
Location: Charlotte, NC
I just recently had to deal with ATL on getting a new replacement custom bladder for a customer's car. They were GREAT to work with, very professional, and everything went very smooth. I haven't dealt any with Fuel Safe, but based on my experience, I'd definitely recommend ATL...

Ed :mrgreen:

_________________
Ed McGuire, SI #577
NASA-SE AI/AIX/CMC/SI Director


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fuel Safe or ATL?
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 3:11 pm 
Offline
Forum Racer
Forum Racer

Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 3:50 pm
Posts: 437
Location: Outside STL
We have a fuel safe in our Fox. It is the stock tank replacement (fits without any mods). We had to get the bladder replaced last year. I don't recall any issues, other than the price for the stock tank model is very steep compared to the box type.

Our S197 has an ATL and haven't had any issues with it. It's the 22 gallon box type drop in.

j

_________________
Jim-
Team UBR
AI- Mustang #75
AI- Mustang #76
SM- Miata #7.7
http://www.facebook.com/TeamUBR


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fuel Safe or ATL?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 6:05 am 
Offline
Forum Hot Lapper
Forum Hot Lapper
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 6:46 am
Posts: 85
Location: Yuma, AZ
Jim,

Could you provide more details on the ATL cell for the S197. I am building one for SI and haven't decided whether to use a stock tank of fuel cell. I don't want to do major surgery if I can help it. The model cell and brief mounting details would help. Do you have any experience with the type that mounts in the spare tire well?

Thanks,

Hal

_________________
Hammerin' Hal
Yuma, AZ
13' Scion FR-S TTD #51
05 Mustang GT (SI)
06 Mustang GT (RIP)
Citation CJ3


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fuel Safe or ATL?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 7:48 am 
Offline
Postmeister
Postmeister
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 5:31 am
Posts: 1100
Location: Cincinnati Ohio
Hal,

Jims cell is a standard atl cell. it's not s197 specific. If you want a cell your going to need to cut that trunk area up . nobody that I'm aware of is making a direct replacement fuel cell for a s197 car. I heard rumors around the WC camp that they where trying to get a s197 cell but I'm pretty sure nothing came to be about it .

32 gallons ? why so big ? that car shouldn't burn but 10-12 gallons for a race. I would think a 18-20 g would be plenty

_________________
S197 Mustang rentals
www.poemotorsports.com
Cincinnati Ohio


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fuel Safe or ATL?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 2:18 pm 
Offline
Forum Spectator
Forum Spectator

Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 8:14 am
Posts: 15
Does anything need to be changed in the PCM calibration to accommodate a fuel cell and/or return fuel system in an S197? Meaning, will it throw the check engine light if the returnless fuel pump is missing or different? Perhaps if the fuel pressure sensor is missing? Are there are other consequences (limp mode?) I know the SI rules encourage a fuel cell installation, but it also requires the calibration file be stock, or Ford Racing stock…


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fuel Safe or ATL?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 4:57 pm 
Offline
Forum Racer
Forum Racer

Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 3:50 pm
Posts: 437
Location: Outside STL
Hal,

Steve summed it up pretty well on the S197 cell. It is a drop in/cut out the trunk type. Nothing special about it.

Olaaf-

The S197 has a carburetor and no return line. And what check engine light? This car has had all things factory pulled out long ago (except the basic dash structure) It runs a push rod motor, MSD ignition and 1950s fuel system and a 21st century AIM dash.

Sorry I can't help with the CIL and other things.

j

_________________
Jim-
Team UBR
AI- Mustang #75
AI- Mustang #76
SM- Miata #7.7
http://www.facebook.com/TeamUBR


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group