nasaforums.com

Official Forums of the National Auto Sport Association
It is currently Wed Jun 19, 2013 6:46 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Can we come play?
PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 4:50 pm 
Offline
Postmeister General
Postmeister General
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:55 pm
Posts: 2396
Location: Virginia Beach
wstukas wrote:
There's absolutely no way a Corvette belongs in AI.

If you want to run a Corvette in a low power builders class, go run ST2.

How is ST2 a lower power class? It's 8.0:1 now; 7.6:1 on 275s. That requires 410-420 rwhp which means a cam and headers in a LS6. Why can't a 9.5:1 C5 run AI. I've been on track running Boss Mustangs in ST2 and they're plenty competent around the track with equal power/weight.

_________________
2001 Quicksilver Z06 #4 - TT3/ST3


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Can we come play?
PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 5:29 pm 
Offline
Postmeister General
Postmeister General

Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 6:13 am
Posts: 2912
Location: New Bern, NC
except the boss mustangs that i think you have been on the track with have full aero packages including vented hoods and if its desalvo and winkler, they are running slicks as well. not dot tires.

if you put them on 275 r6's and take the aero away, they are not going to keep up nearly so well.

_________________
Rob Bodle
Rob Bodle Images/RBI Competition
Mustang FR500C #15
http://www.facebook.com/rbicomp


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Can we come play?
PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 5:57 pm 
Offline
Postmeister General
Postmeister General
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:55 pm
Posts: 2396
Location: Virginia Beach
robbodleimages wrote:
except the boss mustangs that i think you have been on the track with have full aero packages including vented hoods and if its desalvo and winkler, they are running slicks as well. not dot tires.

if you put them on 275 r6's and take the aero away, they are not going to keep up nearly so well.

If they were running slicks then they were cheating. The times I've been out there they've been in A6s which is what I run. My car wasn't/isn't a full ST2 car anyway. I don't have full aero, fancy suspension and I run small tires (255s at the time). Last time I ran ST2 at VIR I was turning 2:04-2:05s on scrub 255 A6s vs. De Salvo and Wally (ST2 C5Z with full aero and 315s etc.) running '02s most of the time.

Just look at how well the Boss did at the runoffs in SCCA T1 this year.

_________________
2001 Quicksilver Z06 #4 - TT3/ST3


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Can we come play?
PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 6:02 pm 
Offline
Postmeister General
Postmeister General

Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 6:13 am
Posts: 2912
Location: New Bern, NC
when ive been on the track with chris and george winkler this season they have been on pirelli or hoosier or toyo slicks. theyve been running aix at the time as well.

this is why i qualified what i said with if's

_________________
Rob Bodle
Rob Bodle Images/RBI Competition
Mustang FR500C #15
http://www.facebook.com/rbicomp


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Can we come play?
PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 6:41 pm 
Offline
Forum Time Trialer
Forum Time Trialer

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:06 pm
Posts: 151
Cobra4B wrote:
wstukas wrote:
There's absolutely no way a Corvette belongs in AI.

If you want to run a Corvette in a low power builders class, go run ST2.

How is ST2 a lower power class? It's 8.0:1 now; 7.6:1 on 275s. That requires 410-420 rwhp which means a cam and headers in a LS6. Why can't a 9.5:1 C5 run AI. I've been on track running Boss Mustangs in ST2 and they're plenty competent around the track with equal power/weight.


I think you may have mis-read my post. I did not say lower power, I said low power. By low power, I mean stock-ish engines. ST2 (and AI too for that matter) does not require a costly engine build. You can get there with a stock LS long block.

I've got a good comparison from my own experience. From what I've learned the C5 platform is far superior to any of the pony cars.

This past April at Road Atlanta I ran with NARRA in GT3 (8.5:1 power/weight). On Saturday I ran my AI car, and on Sunday I drove a bolt on but fairly stock C5Z. I was blown at how good a Corvette really is. We tuned some more power in my AI car to meet GT3 rules. I don't remember the exact HP numbers, somewhere around 350 to the tires. I ran 315 R6's all the way around on both cars. My car has full aero and is 200 lbs lighter than the C5 I drove. The C5 had no aero, and was stock expect long tubes, the older phadt coilovers, swaybars and AP brakes. It was still carrying the freakin' A/C bits. I did not push the C5 that hard because A) it wasn't mine, and B) it had a stock radiator and no oil/trans/diff coolers. I ran a best of 1:32.4 in my Camaro; and a 1:30.4 in the C5. The Corvette was a full 2 seconds a lap faster than my AI car. Imagine what it could do built to the limit of the AI rulebook, less 200 lbs., and with full aero. It would be well into the 1:2X's. AIX cars don't even run that fast...

FWIW my AI car is going up for sale soon; IF it sells, I'm building a ST2 C5. :mrgreen:

_________________
Will Stukas
1993 Camaro Z28, LS1 powered
American Iron #93
2011, 2012 NASA-SE AI Champion


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Can we come play?
PostPosted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 8:51 pm 
Offline
Postmeister General
Postmeister General
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 9:41 am
Posts: 2508
Location: Middle GA /:\
wstukas wrote:
The C5 had no aero

I thought this was the car you ran that day?

Image

_________________
#27 '99 FRC
TT3/TT2/ST3/ST2
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Can we come play?
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:01 am 
Offline
Forum Time Trialer
Forum Time Trialer

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:06 pm
Posts: 151
That wing is a joke. It sits on the deck. The customer put it on for looks. I'm sure it does something, but it's not like the car had a full aero package.

_________________
Will Stukas
1993 Camaro Z28, LS1 powered
American Iron #93
2011, 2012 NASA-SE AI Champion


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Can we come play?
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 5:20 am 
Offline
Postmeister
Postmeister

Joined: Mon May 17, 2010 6:44 am
Posts: 1025
Location: Mooresville, NC
wstukas wrote:
That wing is a joke. It sits on the deck. The customer put it on for looks. I'm sure it does something, but it's not like the car had a full aero package.


That yellow car pictured above has more aero than any PTA legal Vette that ever ran at RA.

_________________
Kevin
$T3/TT3 C5Z06 #01
David Farmer prepped, PCM of NC tuned, CMD Automotive maintained


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Can we come play?
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 5:56 am 
Offline
Postmeister General
Postmeister General
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:55 pm
Posts: 2396
Location: Virginia Beach
wstukas wrote:
Cobra4B wrote:
wstukas wrote:
There's absolutely no way a Corvette belongs in AI.

If you want to run a Corvette in a low power builders class, go run ST2.

How is ST2 a lower power class? It's 8.0:1 now; 7.6:1 on 275s. That requires 410-420 rwhp which means a cam and headers in a LS6. Why can't a 9.5:1 C5 run AI. I've been on track running Boss Mustangs in ST2 and they're plenty competent around the track with equal power/weight.


I think you may have mis-read my post. I did not say lower power, I said low power. By low power, I mean stock-ish engines. ST2 (and AI too for that matter) does not require a costly engine build. You can get there with a stock LS long block.

I've got a good comparison from my own experience. From what I've learned the C5 platform is far superior to any of the pony cars.

This past April at Road Atlanta I ran with NARRA in GT3 (8.5:1 power/weight). On Saturday I ran my AI car, and on Sunday I drove a bolt on but fairly stock C5Z. I was blown at how good a Corvette really is. We tuned some more power in my AI car to meet GT3 rules. I don't remember the exact HP numbers, somewhere around 350 to the tires. I ran 315 R6's all the way around on both cars. My car has full aero and is 200 lbs lighter than the C5 I drove. The C5 had no aero, and was stock expect long tubes, the older phadt coilovers, swaybars and AP brakes. It was still carrying the freakin' A/C bits. I did not push the C5 that hard because A) it wasn't mine, and B) it had a stock radiator and no oil/trans/diff coolers. I ran a best of 1:32.4 in my Camaro; and a 1:30.4 in the C5. The Corvette was a full 2 seconds a lap faster than my AI car. Imagine what it could do built to the limit of the AI rulebook, less 200 lbs., and with full aero. It would be well into the 1:2X's. AIX cars don't even run that fast...

FWIW my AI car is going up for sale soon; IF it sells, I'm building a ST2 C5. :mrgreen:

Impressive time at RA for sure. Get on with the build :)

And yeah that has more aero than what we can run. They won't let us tape up the front bumper coves w/o taking points.

_________________
2001 Quicksilver Z06 #4 - TT3/ST3


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Can we come play?
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 7:42 pm 
Offline
Forum Hot Lapper
Forum Hot Lapper

Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 12:58 pm
Posts: 107
Cobra4B wrote:
So TTA/PTA are being replaced with ST3/TT3 which is 9.0:1 no aero and 9.5:1 aero.


Where has this been put in writing? Or are you Vette clowns stirring stuff up and imagining things. I see NOWHERE that Greg has put this in writing on a national level unless it came out since last thursday.

_________________
ST2 #718
2009 NASA TX AIX Champion
2007 NASA TX AI ROTY
www.rpmschool.net


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group